[Missing Tests]: Regression : Unwanted 'code syntax' is observed in error message dialog. |
|||||||||
Issue descriptionAutomated tests for the below commit have been missing.Would it be possible to add test coverage to avoid regressions in future? CL: === https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/b76712be975e258bbfc4ea62e6e2740064cc8f18 Ref Bug: ======== https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=751384 Thank you...!!
,
Aug 21 2017
#1 I've been kicking around ideas. Doing a 100% job of it doesn't look practical. And we're not able to easily do this kind of test afaik. One of the main sticking points is having some way to generate every webui page/route during testing. crbug 747137 would also benefit from a way to iterate through webui pages. As would automated a11y testing; and some issues with i18n. While there's not an easy solution right off, I think it's important to improve the automation of testing in these areas. (To be clear, it might not be too hard to test this one dialog to avoid regression on this one dialog, but imo that's not a good exchange of time for value -- e.g. I'd rather get a 1:1000 (which may be possible) than a 1:1 effort-to-value exchange).
,
Aug 23 2017
,
Sep 19 2017
Per C#2, is it fine to remove the blocker label here?
,
Sep 19 2017
#4 I think so.
,
Sep 21 2017
,
Oct 13 2017
,
Jun 8 2018
,
Jun 8 2018
,
Jun 11 2018
I'm not sure if there is much to do here outside validating all the HTML? Closing this as WontFix. |
|||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||
Comment 1 by ligim...@chromium.org
, Aug 21 2017