Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
10%-10.8% regression in blink_perf.dom at 491548:491680 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Aug 9 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8971702923863360032
,
Aug 10 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author yosin@chromium.org === Hi yosin@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Yoshifumi Inoue Commit : 44e59041eab4efb2d9cae5e3e7e5623963dd131a Date : Thu Aug 03 07:13:06 2017 Subject: Introduce SelectionForUndoStep Bisect Details Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.dom Metric : textarea-edit/textarea-edit Change : 10.47% | 3.33501184168 -> 2.98586548519 Revision Result N chromium@491547 3.33501 +- 0.0295111 6 good chromium@491614 3.35514 +- 0.0191836 6 good chromium@491647 3.30072 +- 0.0340688 6 good chromium@491664 3.34527 +- 0.0321832 6 good chromium@491666 3.34429 +- 0.0281658 6 good chromium@491667 2.988 +- 0.0244545 6 bad <-- chromium@491668 2.98914 +- 0.0246085 6 bad chromium@491672 2.98999 +- 0.0080112 6 bad chromium@491680 2.98587 +- 0.039307 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.dom More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8971702923863360032 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Aug 21 2017
Mark WontFix since the patch in #c3 makes Chrome records collect selection for undo/redo steps. It requires more update layout call than before. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Aug 9 2017