Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
2.3% regression in jetstream at 492381:492466 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Aug 9 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8971702948451178496
,
Aug 10 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Bisect failed unexpectedly
Bisect was aborted with the following:
Step('Bisecting revision.Post bisect results (10)') failed with return_code 1
Bisect Details
Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
Benchmark : jetstream
Metric : Score/Score
Revision Result N
chromium@492380 182.444 +- 0.902671 6 good
chromium@492423 181.889 +- 0.7698 6 good
chromium@492434 182.222 +- 0.902671 6 good
chromium@492440 182.056 +- 0.871355 6 good
chromium@492443 181.722 +- 1.09713 6 good
chromium@492444 181.778 +- 0.7698 6 good
chromium@492444,v8@a7a166e30c 182.056 +- 1.09713 6 good
chromium@492444,v8@ceb55494bd 181.778 +- 0.608581 6 good
chromium@492444,v8@864837ff3c 179.056 +- 1.6611 6 bad
chromium@492445 178.389 +- 1.6611 6 bad
chromium@492466 178.778 +- 1.01835 6 bad
To Run This Test
src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests jetstream
More information on addressing performance regressions:
http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions
Debug information about this bisect:
https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8971702948451178496
For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Aug 10 2017
,
Aug 10 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8971644299855858944
,
Aug 10 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Ulan Degenbaev Commit : feb3ee40d03137ffcc2be98a01f6ea936cdf45e1 Date : Mon Aug 07 16:21:24 2017 Subject: [heap] Disable parallel scavenge. Bisect Details Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect Benchmark : jetstream Metric : Score/Score Change : 2.10% | 182.222222222 -> 178.388888889 Revision Result N chromium@492380 182.222 +- 1.12217 6 good chromium@492423 182.611 +- 0.732828 6 good chromium@492434 182.0 +- 0.942809 6 good chromium@492440 182.389 +- 1.09713 6 good chromium@492443 182.5 +- 1.13039 6 good chromium@492444 182.056 +- 1.2838 6 good chromium@492444,v8@a7a166e30c 181.889 +- 1.46566 6 good chromium@492444,v8@ceb55494bd 182.0 +- 0.816497 6 good chromium@492444,v8@feb3ee40d0 178.056 +- 1.7267 6 bad <-- chromium@492444,v8@864837ff3c 178.5 +- 1.74801 6 bad chromium@492445 178.167 +- 1.92931 6 bad chromium@492466 178.389 +- 0.871355 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests jetstream More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8971644299855858944 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Aug 9 2017