Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.8% regression in loading.desktop at 491571:491694 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Aug 9 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8971703019293204432
,
Aug 10 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_10_perf_bisect Benchmark : loading.desktop Metric : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/Naver Revision Result N chromium@491570 1241.48 +- 133.004 21 good chromium@491694 1226.34 +- 22.6688 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=Naver loading.desktop More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8971703019293204432 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Sep 14 2017
bisect can't repro. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Aug 9 2017