New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 753980 link

Starred by 3 users

Issue metadata

Status: Fixed
Owner:
Closed: Aug 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

16.4%-239.9% regression in memory.long_running_idle_gmail_tbmv2 at 492366:492519

Project Member Reported by primiano@chromium.org, Aug 9 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=753980

(For debugging:) Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?sid=a96addc1945677da13b8857ee4f0351d1d589e2e31a5aa477cc9427b5ebd0c3d


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-nexus6
chromium-rel-mac-retina
chromium-rel-mac11
chromium-rel-mac12
chromium-rel-mac12-mini-8gb
chromium-rel-win10
chromium-rel-win7-gpu-ati
chromium-rel-win7-gpu-intel
chromium-rel-win7-gpu-nvidia
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Aug 10 2017

Cc: u...@chromium.org
Owner: u...@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)

=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author ulan@chromium.org ===

Hi ulan@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the
results.


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found with culprit

Suspected Commit
  Author : Ulan Degenbaev
  Commit : feb3ee40d03137ffcc2be98a01f6ea936cdf45e1
  Date   : Mon Aug 07 16:21:24 2017
  Subject: [heap] Disable parallel scavenge.

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : memory.long_running_idle_gmail_tbmv2
  Metric       : v8-gc-scavenger_max/v8-gc-scavenger_max
  Change       : 246.51% | 4.41083333333 -> 15.2838333333

Revision                           Result                   N
chromium@492365                    4.41083 +- 0.390452      6      good
chromium@492414                    4.5095 +- 1.27213        6      good
chromium@492439                    4.52467 +- 1.72235       6      good
chromium@492442                    4.396 +- 0.383927        6      good
chromium@492444                    4.3855 +- 0.534151       6      good
chromium@492444,v8@a7a166e30c      4.64817 +- 0.882777      6      good
chromium@492444,v8@ceb55494bd      4.51133 +- 0.701886      6      good
chromium@492444,v8@feb3ee40d0      15.3075 +- 3.18234       6      bad       <--
chromium@492444,v8@864837ff3c      14.6245 +- 1.07941       6      bad
chromium@492445                    14.5082 +- 1.99234       6      bad
chromium@492451                    14.4163 +- 2.24659       6      bad
chromium@492463                    15.2838 +- 2.34091       6      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.long_running_idle_gmail_tbmv2

More information on addressing performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Debug information about this bisect:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8971703448929700544


For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
Project Member

Comment 4 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Aug 10 2017

 Issue 753984  has been merged into this issue.
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Aug 10 2017

 Issue 753981  has been merged into this issue.
Project Member

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Aug 10 2017

 Issue 753998  has been merged into this issue.
Project Member

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Aug 11 2017

Cc: jgruber@chromium.org
 Issue 754625  has been merged into this issue.

Comment 8 by u...@chromium.org, Aug 14 2017

Status: Fixed (was: Assigned)
Parallel marking was re-enabled.

Sign in to add a comment