Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
10%-12.4% regression in blink_perf.dom at 491610:491863 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Aug 9 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8971703617733836336
,
Aug 9 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author yosin@chromium.org === Hi yosin@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Yoshifumi Inoue Commit : f471810d59597fda437adc2db434a2f5f1e58cfc Date : Thu Aug 03 13:01:50 2017 Subject: Reland "Introduce SelectionForUndoStep" Bisect Details Configuration: mac_10_11_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.dom Metric : textarea-edit/textarea-edit Change : 8.85% | 2.77118808855 -> 2.52582271076 Revision Result N chromium@491701 2.77119 +- 0.011628 6 good chromium@491712 2.77037 +- 0.013054 6 good chromium@491714 2.77307 +- 0.0212775 6 good chromium@491715 2.50985 +- 0.0176712 6 bad <-- chromium@491717 2.51129 +- 0.0212253 6 bad chromium@491722 2.51942 +- 0.0238136 6 bad chromium@491742 2.52785 +- 0.0199909 6 bad chromium@491782 2.52582 +- 0.015897 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.dom More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8971703617733836336 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Aug 10 2017
Mark WontFix because the patch mentioned in #c3 does more update layout call before. This is sane since before the patch, we use dirty layout tree. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Aug 9 2017