Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
8.9% regression in v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop at 491363:491456 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Aug 8 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8971854150619328720
,
Aug 8 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: win_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop Metric : V8 C++:duration_avg/browse_media/browse_media_flickr_infinite_scroll Revision Result N chromium@491362 701.326 +- 335.046 21 good chromium@491456 733.123 +- 422.455 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.flickr.infinite.scroll v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8971854150619328720 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Sep 18 2017
The same regression is seen is ref. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Aug 8 2017