Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
Tracking bug for infra-related regressions 2017-08-04 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionThere seems to be a high number of infra-related regressions in which e.g. load_news_washingtonpost_ref shows the same behavior as load_news_washingtonpost: * improvement at 2017-07-27 * regression at 2017-08-04
,
Aug 7 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8971934191837457888
,
Aug 7 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author xunjieli@chromium.org === Hi xunjieli@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : xunjieli Commit : 357e1deefca78c61e457f340270c9cd6f38321f5 Date : Thu Aug 03 22:16:30 2017 Subject: [wpr-go] Use a dummy cert if no cert is recorded Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:allocated_objects_size_avg/load_tools/load_tools_weather Change : 878.24% | 2129308.0 -> 20829651.3333 Revision Result N chromium@491858 2129308 +- 0.0 6 good chromium@491912 2129308 +- 0.0 6 good chromium@491919 2129308 +- 0.0 6 good chromium@491923 2129308 +- 0.0 6 good chromium@491924 2129308 +- 0.0 6 good chromium@491924,catapult@b0f1e24d46 2129308 +- 0.0 6 good chromium@491924,catapult@357e1deefc 21130145 +- 482774 6 bad <-- chromium@491925 20874211 +- 422247 6 bad chromium@491926 20934291 +- 385162 6 bad chromium@491939 20948284 +- 415710 6 bad chromium@491965 20829651 +- 361980 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.tools.weather system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8971934191837457888 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Aug 7 2017
I assume the bisect result is invalid, unassigning.
,
Aug 7 2017
Thanks jgruber@. The bisect is correct. 357e1deefca78c61e457f340270c9cd6f38321f5 fixed an issue where some pages were loading incompletely after wprgo migration (r489923). Because pages were loading incompletely, some memory metrics "improved". I see that these memory metrics have gone back to their original values before r489923, so I am applying WontFix here.
,
Aug 8 2017
Issue 752864 has been merged into this issue.
,
Aug 8 2017
,
Aug 9 2017
,
Aug 9 2017
,
Aug 9 2017
,
Aug 9 2017
Issue 753827 has been merged into this issue.
,
Aug 10 2017
,
Aug 11 2017
Issue 754631 has been merged into this issue. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Aug 7 2017