Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
25.7%-26.3% regression in system_health.common_mobile at 490023:490131 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Aug 4 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8972207517359711104
,
Aug 4 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.common_mobile Metric : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/load_search/load_search_ebay Revision Result N chromium@490022 459.799 +- 94.8947 21 good chromium@490131 448.447 +- 109.227 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.search.ebay system_health.common_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8972207517359711104 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Aug 4 2017
I'm not convinced there's a regression here. The ref still seems very close to the metric. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Aug 4 2017