Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
9.3% regression in v8.browsing_desktop at 490250:490395 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Aug 3 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8972264480137130816
,
Aug 4 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: win_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.browsing_desktop Metric : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_max/browse_media/browse_media_imgur Revision Result N chromium@490249 109806348 +- 32403414 21 good chromium@490395 113251669 +- 51956562 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.imgur v8.browsing_desktop More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8972264480137130816 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Aug 14 2017
Not reproducible. |
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Aug 3 2017