Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
19.1%-23.7% regression in v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop at 490680:490683 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Aug 3 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8972265608300376240
,
Aug 3 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_high_dpi_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop Metric : v8-gc-scavenger_avg/browse_news/browse_news_flipboard Revision Result N chromium@490681 2.50493 +- 1.22397 21 good chromium@490683 2.47568 +- 0.796822 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.news.flipboard v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8972265608300376240 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Aug 21 2017
Not reproducible. |
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Aug 3 2017