Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.3%-27.9% regression in system_health.memory_desktop at 490746:490774 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Aug 3 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8972297638357048528
,
Aug 3 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author xunjieli@chromium.org === Hi xunjieli@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Helen Li Commit : 05ee1dbfaf0aa7c03b9ea2040f0345277042d0f1 Date : Mon Jul 31 13:24:01 2017 Subject: [wpr-go] Switch system_health_desktop.json to use go Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_10_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_desktop Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:cc:effective_size_avg/load_media/load_media_9gag Change : 27.92% | 9516864.0 -> 12173886.6667 Revision Result N chromium@490745 9516864 +- 12624.7 6 good chromium@490749 9535979 +- 89066.4 6 good chromium@490750 9533931 +- 91344.8 6 good chromium@490751 12187540 +- 87610.4 6 bad <-- chromium@490753 12185492 +- 89925.6 6 bad chromium@490760 12185492 +- 89925.6 6 bad chromium@490774 12173887 +- 10707.2 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.media.9gag system_health.memory_desktop More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8972297638357048528 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Aug 3 2017
Issue 751984 has been merged into this issue.
,
Aug 3 2017
I presume this isn't actually a regression and we can just WontFix this. Please confirm.
,
Aug 3 2017
Issue 751983 has been merged into this issue.
,
Aug 3 2017
I do not know why WprGo has an effect on memory allocated by CC. The jump isn't too much, and given that memory usage increased across the board, I think it's safe to say that this is a part of the change in performance characteristics from the WebPageReplay rewrite. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Aug 3 2017