Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
15.8% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 490683:490685 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Aug 3 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8972297703788238656
,
Aug 3 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:skia:effective_size_avg/browse_social/browse_social_facebook Revision Result N chromium@490682 752170 +- 400899 21 good chromium@490685 731722 +- 298335 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.social.facebook system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8972297703788238656 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Aug 4 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8972208180713374448
,
Aug 4 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:skia:effective_size_avg/browse_social/browse_social_facebook Revision Result N chromium@490600 751624 +- 398348 21 good chromium@490700 767211 +- 482448 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.social.facebook system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8972208180713374448 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Sep 18 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8968091553975460384
,
Sep 18 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8968091539935234000
,
Sep 18 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8968091513833657072
,
Sep 18 2017
Both the previous bisects were on the skia regressions, which are under our new 128kib thresholds. Re-kicked bisects on some of the larger regressions.
,
Sep 18 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author xunjieli@chromium.org === Hi xunjieli@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Helen Li Commit : 73f7cac54a1108eac07d5c7c3367f979a899a0bd Date : Thu Jul 27 14:57:57 2017 Subject: [wpr-go] Switch system_health_mobile.json to use go Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_nexus6_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:native_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/browse_news/browse_news_qq Change : 5.12% | 29290201.3333 -> 30788484.0 Revision Result N chromium@489564 29290201 +- 835426 6 good chromium@489868 29391748 +- 787301 6 good chromium@489906 29469743 +- 507149 6 good chromium@489916 29515481 +- 371658 6 good chromium@489921 29269209 +- 816316 6 good chromium@489922 29317679 +- 524853 6 good chromium@489923 30186031 +- 516085 6 bad <-- chromium@489925 30006148 +- 251412 6 bad chromium@489944 30073220 +- 531652 6 bad chromium@490020 30163161 +- 492250 6 bad chromium@490172 30126980 +- 471521 6 bad chromium@490779 30788484 +- 155756 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.news.qq system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8968091553975460384 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Sep 18 2017
,
Sep 18 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Helen Li Commit : 73f7cac54a1108eac07d5c7c3367f979a899a0bd Date : Thu Jul 27 14:57:57 2017 Subject: [wpr-go] Switch system_health_mobile.json to use go Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_nexus6_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:cc:effective_size_avg/browse_news/browse_news_cricbuzz Change : 4.83% | 27579216.0 -> 28911572.0 Revision Result N chromium@489564 27579216 +- 0.0 6 good chromium@489868 27605377 +- 221986 9 good chromium@489906 27605377 +- 221986 9 good chromium@489916 27579216 +- 0.0 6 good chromium@489921 27767632 +- 1031997 6 good chromium@489922 27564273 +- 81844.4 6 good chromium@489923 29288404 +- 1384569 6 bad <-- chromium@489925 29476820 +- 1305384 6 bad chromium@489944 28863472 +- 1988980 9 bad chromium@490020 29288404 +- 1384569 6 bad chromium@490172 28801640 +- 271877 6 bad chromium@490779 28911572 +- 1031997 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.news.cricbuzz system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8968091539935234000 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Sep 19 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author ulan@chromium.org === Hi ulan@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Ulan Degenbaev Commit : 774a4c5e240569b551cc9d19ae8cac146891d4c4 Date : Fri Jul 28 19:42:31 2017 Subject: Revert "[heap] Reland "[heap] Allow a minimum semi-space size of 512K."" Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_nexus6_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/load_games/load_games_bubbles Change : 9.93% | 6959755.33333 -> 7650920.0 Revision Result N chromium@489564 6959755 +- 146443 6 good chromium@490172 6952525 +- 127420 6 good chromium@490476 6964333 +- 96709.5 6 good chromium@490628 6949805 +- 166036 6 good chromium@490647 6988666 +- 103104 6 good chromium@490652 6976465 +- 101749 6 good chromium@490652,v8@59ddd6061c 6953093 +- 106045 6 good chromium@490652,v8@e567dd3ab4 6931487 +- 98781.1 6 good chromium@490652,v8@774a4c5e24 7674649 +- 106784 6 bad <-- chromium@490652,v8@4a9718c777 7587918 +- 81969.0 6 bad chromium@490653 7644409 +- 126584 6 bad chromium@490654 7609918 +- 119124 6 bad chromium@490655 7624275 +- 74736.4 6 bad chromium@490657 7604845 +- 101610 6 bad chromium@490666 7583398 +- 162860 6 bad chromium@490704 7638042 +- 112493 6 bad chromium@490779 7650920 +- 108991 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.games.bubbles system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8968091513833657072 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Sep 29 2017
Regression comes from a reverted CL. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Aug 3 2017