Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
13.9% regression in thread_times.key_mobile_sites_smooth at 490676:490681 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Aug 3 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8972297718651583056
,
Aug 3 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus7_perf_bisect Benchmark : thread_times.key_mobile_sites_smooth Metric : thread_GPU_cpu_time_per_frame/http___cuteoverload.com Revision Result N chromium@490675 3.13792 +- 0.565069 21 good chromium@490681 3.08108 +- 0.568929 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...cuteoverload.com thread_times.key_mobile_sites_smooth More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8972297718651583056 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Aug 3 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8972293713762319136
,
Aug 3 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author mtklein@chromium.org === Hi mtklein@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Mike Klein Commit : 5f9b59b52db2b9a11d41bb7fa93ec5e5d6104236 Date : Sat Jul 29 12:28:32 2017 Subject: use new Stage ABI for ARMv7 too Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus7_perf_bisect Benchmark : thread_times.key_mobile_sites_smooth Metric : thread_GPU_cpu_time_per_frame/http___cuteoverload.com Change : 13.01% | 2.78504878178 -> 3.1474584063 Revision Result N chromium@490000 2.78505 +- 0.0634163 6 good chromium@490400 2.75571 +- 0.16949 6 good chromium@490600 2.65596 +- 0.122717 6 good chromium@490650 2.70128 +- 0.173267 6 good chromium@490657 2.71999 +- 0.0699287 6 good chromium@490660 2.68031 +- 0.0685749 6 good chromium@490660,skia@5f9b59b52d 3.00646 +- 0.43156 6 bad <-- chromium@490661 3.16025 +- 0.0887005 6 bad chromium@490662 3.15595 +- 0.135087 6 bad chromium@490663 3.0673 +- 0.231734 6 bad chromium@490675 3.1174 +- 0.124306 6 bad chromium@490700 3.05616 +- 0.0816902 6 bad chromium@490800 3.14746 +- 0.264994 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...cuteoverload.com thread_times.key_mobile_sites_smooth More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8972293713762319136 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Aug 3 2017
"use new Stage ABI for ARMv7 too" is a mixed bag of wins and losses, but we think the wins are winning. Going to WontFix this for now. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Aug 3 2017