Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
5.7% regression in thread_times.key_mobile_sites_smooth at 490132:490368 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Aug 3 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8972297768368595440
,
Aug 3 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found but unable to continue Bisect was stopped because a commit couldn't be classified as either good or bad. Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Benchmark : thread_times.key_mobile_sites_smooth Metric : thread_renderer_compositor_cpu_time_per_frame/http___cuteoverload.com Revision Result N chromium@490131 2.67636 +- 0.425912 21 good chromium@490190 2.65976 +- 0.337566 14 good chromium@490219 2.65847 +- 0.555533 21 good chromium@490220 --- --- build failure --- --- --- too many build failures to list chromium@490225 2.68825 +- 0.509341 21 unknown chromium@490243 --- --- build failure chromium@490244 2.76391 +- 0.510602 21 bad chromium@490250 2.7589 +- 0.524646 14 bad chromium@490368 2.78415 +- 0.422284 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...cuteoverload.com thread_times.key_mobile_sites_smooth More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8972297768368595440 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Aug 4 2017
This looks like noise. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Aug 3 2017