New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 751643 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Aug 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

2.1% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 490539:490626

Project Member Reported by sullivan@chromium.org, Aug 2 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=751643

(For debugging:) Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?sid=d75038113893ef3235b5c10fb05ca34cc0bc39ec32ab759d6806395e2999b040


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-nexus5X

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_mobile
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:malloc:effective_size_avg/load_tools/load_tools_stackoverflow

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@490538      41647649 +- 1974709      21      good
chromium@490626      41360853 +- 1714903      21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.tools.stackoverflow system_health.memory_mobile

More information on addressing performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Debug information about this bisect:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8972367894509351616


For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
Trying a bisect on a wider range, since the graph has two bumps upward.

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found but unable to narrow commit range

Build failures prevented the bisect from narrowing the range further.


Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_mobile
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:malloc:effective_size_avg/load_tools/load_tools_stackoverflow
  Change       : 1.91% | 40844100.0 -> 41622662.6667

Suspected Commit Range
  2 commits in range
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/41b895907e65a2131803d93c690f8f43b67d7d7d..8614988bf1b12c4031f54d421feb7d34a5d71a88


Revision             Result                   N
chromium@490022      40844100 +- 939462       6        good
chromium@490324      40928661 +- 726723       9        good
chromium@490343      40622423 +- 1421365      14       good
chromium@490352      40225405 +- 1276092      14       good
chromium@490353      ---                      ---      build failure
chromium@490354      40858432 +- 1309623      9        bad
chromium@490355      40833787 +- 814019       6        bad
chromium@490356      41026892 +- 1332536      6        bad
chromium@490358      40590305 +- 1365563      14       bad
chromium@490362      41073378 +- 2212416      14       bad
chromium@490400      41743404 +- 734645       6        bad
chromium@490475      41477365 +- 859578       9        bad
chromium@490626      41622663 +- 525749       6        bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.tools.stackoverflow system_health.memory_mobile

More information on addressing performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Debug information about this bisect:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8972364473092410464


For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
The second bisect looks pretty noisy, and the first couldn't reproduce. Closing.

Sign in to add a comment