New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 751160 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner:
Closed: Aug 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

5.4%-13.1% regression in sizes at 490493:490500

Project Member Reported by sullivan@chromium.org, Aug 1 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=751160

(For debugging:) Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?sid=042b010132b01074c9c56d4bd0408a9c1fdfba70a0cc3d56481bc742b904df26


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

win-32
Cc: grt@chromium.org
Owner: updowndota@chromium.org
updowndota: This is due to "Add strings for voice interaction OOBE error screen" (https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/591635)
This CL only add a few string constants which are not even used right now. How possible will this cause such regressions?

Comment 4 by zpeng@chromium.org, Aug 1 2017

Cc: h...@chromium.org
+hans@

I think the alert and the graph is probably off by one, so the culprit would be crrev.com/490494, which looks very likely to cause such a large jump in binary size.

Hans, what do you think?

Comment 5 by h...@chromium.org, Aug 1 2017

Owner: h...@chromium.org
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
Yes, this matches the expected size changes from the clang switch. 32-bit sizes increase and 64-bit sizes decrease.

Sign in to add a comment