Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.3%-4.8% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 489986:490297 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSplitting from https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=750696 since the CL blamed there is after these regressions.
,
Aug 1 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8972471044174963008
,
Aug 1 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8972470941239734928
,
Aug 1 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8972470932696055472
,
Aug 1 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8972470917051181088
,
Aug 1 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:malloc:effective_size_avg/load_tools/load_tools_drive Revision Result N chromium@489985 23883627 +- 1487380 21 good chromium@490179 24064086 +- 856820 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.tools.drive system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8972471044174963008 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Aug 1 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found but unable to continue Bisect was stopped because a commit couldn't be classified as either good or bad. Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:malloc:effective_size_avg/load_news/load_news_nytimes Revision Result N chromium@490220 38879187 +- 1710460 21 good chromium@490259 39042410 +- 1682088 21 unknown chromium@490297 39241053 +- 1187264 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.news.nytimes system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8972470941239734928 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Aug 1 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:malloc:effective_size_avg/load_media/load_media_dailymotion Revision Result N chromium@489985 20882163 +- 593237 21 good chromium@490179 20842775 +- 308812 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.media.dailymotion system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8972470917051181088 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Aug 1 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author ulan@chromium.org === Hi ulan@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Ulan Degenbaev Commit : 2cc8fdfb47226101b958da465d64803368fb7c76 Date : Thu Jul 27 11:09:24 2017 Subject: [heap] Re-implement weak cell tracking in the marker. Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/foreground/https_m_facebook_com_rihanna Change : 2.12% | 5321503.33333 -> 5208914.66667 Revision Result N chromium@489985 5321503 +- 1382.36 6 good chromium@490010 5321615 +- 1256.45 6 good chromium@490022 5321623 +- 528.406 6 good chromium@490025 5321153 +- 1370.25 6 good chromium@490027 5320770 +- 900.857 6 good chromium@490027,v8@2cc8fdfb47 5210363 +- 2369.99 6 bad <-- chromium@490027,v8@6a75fcd4df 5210277 +- 1713.04 6 bad chromium@490027,v8@e4bbf92be3 5209797 +- 2729.62 6 bad chromium@490027,v8@9836cdb1ad 5210377 +- 2054.52 6 bad chromium@490028 5210345 +- 2943.28 6 bad chromium@490034 5182315 +- 148440 6 bad chromium@490082 5210058 +- 2765.37 6 bad chromium@490179 5208915 +- 1593.8 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8972470932696055472 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Aug 3 2017
,
Aug 3 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8972257831337394816
,
Aug 3 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8972257700647578832
,
Aug 3 2017
Removing myself from the owner because bisect in #9 is about improvement in memory usage. Issue 751988 is also about improvement. Regressions did not bisect to my CL.
,
Aug 3 2017
Issue 752174 has been merged into this issue.
,
Aug 3 2017
Issue 751990 has been merged into this issue.
,
Aug 3 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:malloc:effective_size_avg/load_tools/load_tools_drive Revision Result N chromium@489985 24058401 +- 810244 21 good chromium@490179 24041959 +- 497851 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.tools.drive system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8972257831337394816 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Aug 3 2017
Issue 752016 has been merged into this issue.
,
Aug 4 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:malloc:effective_size_avg/load_news/load_news_nytimes Revision Result N chromium@490220 38743111 +- 827181 21 good chromium@490297 38845955 +- 1143722 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.news.nytimes system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8972257700647578832 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Aug 4 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8972202218891608464
,
Aug 4 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Helen Li Commit : 73f7cac54a1108eac07d5c7c3367f979a899a0bd Date : Thu Jul 27 14:57:57 2017 Subject: [wpr-go] Switch system_health_mobile.json to use go Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:malloc:effective_size_avg/load_news/load_news_nytimes Change : 2.38% | 38173454.6667 -> 39081099.6667 Revision Result N chromium@489872 38173455 +- 493716 6 good chromium@489905 38322803 +- 820624 9 good chromium@489922 38264276 +- 664331 9 good chromium@489923 38727617 +- 563642 6 bad <-- chromium@489924 38784380 +- 528421 6 bad chromium@489926 38839749 +- 386160 6 bad chromium@489930 38696947 +- 652207 14 bad chromium@489938 38786361 +- 478284 9 bad chromium@490004 38803436 +- 429458 6 bad chromium@490135 38849354 +- 533277 6 bad chromium@490397 39081100 +- 327057 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.news.nytimes system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8972202218891608464 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Aug 4 2017
Thanks for triaging the alerts. The increase in reported_by_chrome:malloc look reasonable to me. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Aug 1 2017