New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 750772 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Duplicate
Merged: issue 750919
Owner: ----
Closed: Aug 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

3.1%-204.1% regression in system_health.memory_desktop at 489886:490078

Project Member Reported by majidvp@google.com, Jul 31 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
Project Member

Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jul 31 2017

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=750772

(For debugging:) Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?sid=284a0c62b0a18f3c7bbae8b215cd2f28eedd5126f50de863e843e95ba8f17f54


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-mac-retina
chromium-rel-mac11
chromium-rel-mac11-air
chromium-rel-mac12
chromium-rel-win10
chromium-rel-win7-dual

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found but unable to narrow commit range

Build failures prevented the bisect from narrowing the range further.


Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_11_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2_site_isolation.basic_oopif
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___booking.com
  Change       : 9.72% | 186.630571429 -> 204.762777778

Suspected Commit Range
  3 commits in range
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/7b133f7a628429e59d18371456152694f9ab5480..8e7b09023501bc23c8c38c09c2b30e23c40f3523


Revision             Result                  N
chromium@489915      186.631 +- 49.1089      14       good
chromium@489942      216.366 +- 186.945      14       good
chromium@489958      198.08 +- 108.824       14       good
chromium@489959      ---                     ---      build failure
chromium@489960      ---                     ---      build failure
chromium@489961      262.853 +- 205.559      14       bad
chromium@489966      282.184 +- 271.402      14       bad
chromium@489969      235.424 +- 203.005      14       bad
chromium@490022      204.763 +- 108.569      9        bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...booking.com page_cycler_v2_site_isolation.basic_oopif

More information on addressing performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Debug information about this bisect:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8972529359957568880


For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
Cc: perezju@chromium.org erikc...@chromium.org
Split off some unrelated smoothness regressions into  bug 757591 . Kicked off a few bisects.

+erikchen, perezju: these graphs go up and down a LOT. is it expected?
Cc: primiano@chromium.org
> these graphs go up and down a LOT

Which ones, specifically? Are you referring to:

gpu:effective_size_avg
v8:heap:effective_size_avg
v8:effective_size_avg

or something else entirely?

The v8 metrics are known to be noisy. I started a discussion: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=736506#c2

But the v8 team wanted to keep alerting on them. The bug is still open. :(
Project Member

Comment 8 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Aug 21 2017

Mergedinto: 750919
Status: Duplicate (was: Untriaged)

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found with culprit

Suspected Commit
  Author : Daniele Castagna
  Commit : b5168e0d1731a1e4b8e6da22bdac6d08f6ab41a2
  Date   : Thu Jul 27 17:15:53 2017
  Subject: viz: Align OutputSurface and BufferQueue in flight buffers.

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_12_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : memory.desktop
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:gpu:effective_size_avg/TrivialAnimationPageSharedPageState
  Change       : 38.08% | 20229768.0 -> 27933945.7778

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@489905      20229768 +- 0.0          6      good
chromium@489962      20229768 +- 0.0          6      good
chromium@489990      20229768 +- 0.0          6      good
chromium@489997      20229768 +- 0.0          6      good
chromium@489999      20812310 +- 4943035      9      good
chromium@490000      20812310 +- 4943035      9      good
chromium@490001      25822230 +- 2957872      6      bad       <--
chromium@490004      24729964 +- 3677118      6      bad
chromium@490018      27933946 +- 5035495      6      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=TrivialAnimationPageSharedPageState memory.desktop

More information on addressing performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Debug information about this bisect:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8970614765031488560


For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
Project Member

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Aug 21 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found with culprit

Suspected Commit
  Author : Daniele Castagna
  Commit : b5168e0d1731a1e4b8e6da22bdac6d08f6ab41a2
  Date   : Thu Jul 27 17:15:53 2017
  Subject: viz: Align OutputSurface and BufferQueue in flight buffers.

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_12_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_desktop
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:gpu:effective_size_avg/browse_social/browse_social_tumblr_infinite_scroll
  Change       : 31.75% | 17577619.3333 -> 23159174.8889

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@489905      17577619 +- 37781.8      6      good
chromium@489962      17572323 +- 39695.7      6      good
chromium@489990      17588526 +- 0.0          6      good
chromium@489997      17561259 +- 29869.1      6      good
chromium@489999      17561259 +- 29869.1      6      good
chromium@490000      17561417 +- 29708.8      6      good
chromium@490001      23517810 +- 1242565      6      bad       <--
chromium@490004      23710762 +- 979833       6      bad
chromium@490018      23159175 +- 1299023      6      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.social.tumblr.infinite.scroll system_health.memory_desktop

More information on addressing performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Debug information about this bisect:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8970614708891896496


For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection

Sign in to add a comment