New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 750760 link

Starred by 4 users

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner:
Closed: Sep 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

23.8%-223.1% regression in v8.browsing_desktop at 489850:490007 (Parallel scavange experiment)

Project Member Reported by ulan@google.com, Jul 31 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
Project Member

Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jul 31 2017

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=750760

(For debugging:) Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?sid=534938f04bbef4a8b394f8d9383712ed44d5e23d0582b1c577992553f9dbed2b


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-mac-retina
chromium-rel-mac11
chromium-rel-mac11-air
chromium-rel-mac11-pro
chromium-rel-win7-dual
chromium-rel-win7-gpu-ati
chromium-rel-win7-gpu-intel
chromium-rel-win7-gpu-nvidia
chromium-rel-win7-x64-dual
chromium-rel-win8-dual
Cc: hablich@chromium.org
Owner: hablich@chromium.org

=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author hablich@chromium.org ===

Hi hablich@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the
results.


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found with culprit

Suspected Commit
  Author : Michael Hablich
  Commit : 9bac201e0e32f198064a10c3032dbd839e8e8efd
  Date   : Thu Jul 27 07:10:02 2017
  Subject: Version 6.2.52.1 (cherry-pick)

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_8_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.browsing_desktop
  Metric       : v8-gc-incremental-step_sum/browse_social/browse_social_facebook_infinite_scroll
  Change       : 67.50% | 163.3815 -> 273.665666667

Revision                           Result                  N
chromium@489864                    163.381 +- 35.2665      6      good
chromium@489884                    155.21 +- 3.15504       6      good
chromium@489894                    154.991 +- 3.53535      6      good
chromium@489897                    155.601 +- 4.94801      6      good
chromium@489897,v8@9bac201e0e      260.43 +- 33.5766       6      bad       <--
chromium@489898                    263.496 +- 118.812      6      bad
chromium@489899                    243.234 +- 65.652       6      bad
chromium@489904                    273.666 +- 74.7101      6      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.social.facebook.infinite.scroll v8.browsing_desktop

More information on addressing performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Debug information about this bisect:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8972530867542632416


For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
Cc: majidvp@chromium.org
 Issue 750853  has been merged into this issue.
Cc: u...@chromium.org
 Issue 750759  has been merged into this issue.
Project Member

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Aug 22 2017

Issue 751663 has been merged into this issue.
Project Member

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Aug 22 2017

Cc: tebbi@chromium.org
 Issue 752071  has been merged into this issue.
Owner: mlippautz@chromium.org
Summary: 23.8%-223.1% regression in v8.browsing_desktop at 489850:490007 (Parallel scavange experiment) (was: 23.8%-223.1% regression in v8.browsing_desktop at 489850:490007)
Status: WontFix (was: Assigned)
This is going to stick. The changes are mainly incremental marking step sums which seems related to GC timing.

Sign in to add a comment