Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.3%-4.8% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 489905:490338 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jul 31 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8972540224406082512
,
Jul 31 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:malloc:effective_size_avg/load_tools/load_tools_drive Revision Result N chromium@489985 24017098 +- 1012924 21 good chromium@490179 24041851 +- 1190309 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.tools.drive system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8972540224406082512 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Jul 31 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8972510401603053120
,
Aug 1 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Helen Li Commit : 73f7cac54a1108eac07d5c7c3367f979a899a0bd Date : Thu Jul 27 14:57:57 2017 Subject: [wpr-go] Switch system_health_mobile.json to use go Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus6_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:malloc:effective_size_avg/background_search/background_search_google Change : 4.87% | 35729669.2222 -> 37517042.7778 Revision Result N chromium@489904 35729669 +- 385622 9 good chromium@489918 35642850 +- 489856 6 good chromium@489922 35780127 +- 607412 9 good chromium@489923 37264566 +- 2084170 9 bad <-- chromium@489924 37264208 +- 2766450 14 bad chromium@489925 37288663 +- 974115 9 bad chromium@489932 37191877 +- 1484139 6 bad chromium@489959 36947317 +- 1552269 6 bad chromium@490013 37035230 +- 1074689 6 bad chromium@490121 37202261 +- 2540910 14 bad chromium@490338 37517043 +- 516077 9 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=background.search.google system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8972510401603053120 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Jul 31 2017