Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
14.1%-20.1% regression in blink_perf.events at 488939:489058 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jul 28 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8972812162651876944
,
Jul 28 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Justin Schuh Commit : 4a572da99ce704e632221bd05e6d894d49a73dcc Date : Mon Jul 24 14:37:24 2017 Subject: Replace Saturated*() calls with Clamp*() templates Bisect Details Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.events Metric : hit-test-lots-of-layers/hit-test-lots-of-layers Change : 9.54% | 0.850697263947 -> 0.769534089611 Revision Result N chromium@488964 0.850697 +- 0.00283987 6 good chromium@488965 0.848857 +- 0.0025474 6 good chromium@488966 0.772099 +- 0.0101274 6 bad <-- chromium@488967 0.770972 +- 0.0109101 6 bad chromium@488970 0.76816 +- 0.0089224 6 bad chromium@488976 0.772901 +- 0.0102748 6 bad chromium@488988 0.77834 +- 0.00273552 6 bad chromium@489011 0.772451 +- 0.00519362 6 bad chromium@489058 0.769534 +- 0.00308258 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.events More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8972812162651876944 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Sep 18 2017
Fixing duplicate marking from #3. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Jul 28 2017