Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1%-11% regression in v8.browsing_desktop at 486074:487676 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jul 25 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8973091317708869840
,
Jul 25 2017
,
Jul 25 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: win_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.browsing_desktop Metric : v8-gc-full-mark-compactor_max/browse_social/browse_social_twitter Revision Result N chromium@487019 8.95605 +- 2.21944 21 good chromium@487021 8.77771 +- 1.93787 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.social.twitter v8.browsing_desktop More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8973091317708869840 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Nov 21 2017
MOstly recovered. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Jul 25 2017