New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 748457 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Aug 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

1.3% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 488741:488859

Project Member Reported by hjd@google.com, Jul 25 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
Project Member

Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jul 25 2017

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=748457

(For debugging:) Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?sid=96f2d38f119895cd68c56df446633d950cd61535c9a19308e0054495b484997f


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-nexus5
Project Member

Comment 3 by sheriffbot@chromium.org, Jul 25 2017

Labels: Hotlist-Google
Project Member

Comment 4 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jul 26 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found but unable to narrow commit range

Build failures prevented the bisect from narrowing the range further.


Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_mobile
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:native_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/load_search/load_search_ebay
  Change       : 1.26% | 21790566.6667 -> 22066022.6667

Suspected Commit Range
  7 commits in range
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8.git/+log/a45048e20582e7fb1f1f5c7d4b77110dab1f9cba..edc0eede74e732b1359227d246fdb64553b776e2


Revision                           Result                   N
chromium@488740                    21790567 +- 138361       6        good
chromium@488744                    21874193 +- 164226       6        good
chromium@488745                    21864782 +- 422808       14       good
chromium@488745,v8@99bbf7b743      21906474 +- 595858       14       good
chromium@488745,v8@1084d20978      21852007 +- 344549       6        good
chromium@488745,v8@a45048e205      21855859 +- 447232       14       good
chromium@488745,v8@f24b6f96f8      ---                      ---      build failure
chromium@488745,v8@bdfd69a07e      ---                      ---      build failure
chromium@488745,v8@69c8f16da7      ---                      ---      build failure
chromium@488745,v8@9d0438ba56      ---                      ---      build failure
chromium@488745,v8@8ab48b6c04      ---                      ---      build failure
chromium@488745,v8@62f8337742      ---                      ---      build failure
chromium@488745,v8@edc0eede74      22085381 +- 246707       14       bad
chromium@488746                    22034474 +- 330013       14       bad
chromium@488748                    22108348 +- 159466       6        bad
chromium@488755                    22075068 +- 124255       6        bad
chromium@488770                    22067900 +- 64536.4      6        bad
chromium@488800                    22067388 +- 77941.8      6        bad
chromium@488859                    22066023 +- 72225.3      6        bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.search.ebay system_health.memory_mobile

More information on addressing performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Debug information about this bisect:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8973104458441162256


For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
Looks like this metric has mostly recovered.  We can close this.

Sign in to add a comment