Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
2% regression in memory.top_10_mobile at 488645:488797 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jul 24 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8973181283297945152
,
Jul 24 2017
,
Jul 25 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_nexus6_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile Metric : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:malloc:effective_size_avg/background/after_http_m_intl_taobao_com_group_purchase_html Revision Result N chromium@488644 34658807 +- 1555083 21 good chromium@488797 34843654 +- 1433243 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8973181283297945152 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Jul 25 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8973085331180817792
,
Jul 25 2017
Re-bisecting on cleaner signal
,
Jul 26 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Ulan Degenbaev Commit : 176a2b24fb23a0c9a3bc9eec27f6445dbfa5ab27 Date : Wed Jul 19 13:04:47 2017 Subject: [heap] Reland "[heap] Allow a minimum semi-space size of 512K." Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/foreground/http_search_yahoo_com_search__ylt_p_google Change : 1.50% | 5082244.0 -> 5158663.33333 Revision Result N chromium@488742 5082244 +- 34347.2 6 good chromium@488745 5085117 +- 29513.6 6 good chromium@488745,v8@ae9a2d38f3 5084044 +- 42763.2 6 good chromium@488745,v8@91c1a81d0e 5085400 +- 27732.0 6 good chromium@488745,v8@bb29f9a4d6 5089845 +- 28443.8 6 good chromium@488745,v8@176a2b24fb 5179975 +- 53276.7 6 bad <-- chromium@488745,v8@7cfd0c249e 5180589 +- 87964.4 6 bad chromium@488745,v8@b23b8c088c 5149384 +- 57155.1 6 bad chromium@488746 5149593 +- 50450.8 6 bad chromium@488747 5144212 +- 43323.7 6 bad chromium@488748 5166936 +- 48393.4 6 bad chromium@488754 5155953 +- 46204.7 6 bad chromium@488766 5172351 +- 62579.7 6 bad chromium@488789 5162849 +- 67349.4 6 bad chromium@488836 5158663 +- 31016.3 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8973085331180817792 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Jul 24 2017