Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.2% regression in memory.top_10_mobile at 485815:485894 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jul 24 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8973189251820787872
,
Jul 24 2017
,
Jul 25 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus7_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:native_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/foreground/http_search_yahoo_com_search__ylt_p_google Revision Result N chromium@485814 24882237 +- 982771 21 good chromium@485894 24951966 +- 1145059 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8973189251820787872 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Sep 14 2017
This graph is really noisy, comes back down eventually, and bisect can't repro. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Jul 24 2017