Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 487677:487765 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jul 24 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8973189793308992640
,
Jul 24 2017
,
Jul 24 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus7_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:malloc:effective_size_avg/load_search/load_search_ebay Revision Result N chromium@487676 18438382 +- 368528 21 good chromium@487765 18410428 +- 394588 20 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.search.ebay system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8973189793308992640 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Sep 14 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8968440492314271264
,
Sep 15 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found but unable to narrow commit range Build failures prevented the bisect from narrowing the range further. Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:native_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/browse_shopping/browse_shopping_avito Change : 2.56% | 59939041.1429 -> 61475187.4286 Suspected Commit Range 12 commits in range https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/4afd513b88234976f17b06eee24892ce9d149e7e..e5ef88bfc930b8066ae7c8a5ec5cf35577bbcd2b Revision Result N chromium@485946 59939041 +- 3180659 14 good chromium@486391 59384301 +- 1665414 6 good chromium@486630 59846751 +- 1866415 9 good chromium@486741 59383887 +- 3539144 14 good chromium@486745 59437793 +- 4081839 14 good chromium@486745,v8@44cce0fcc0 --- --- build failure --- --- --- too many build failures to list chromium@486745,v8@a97abb909b --- --- build failure chromium@486746 61058883 +- 1557088 6 bad chromium@486747 60682335 +- 2211835 9 bad chromium@486748 61028788 +- 3394001 9 bad chromium@486755 60718744 +- 2890279 14 bad chromium@486769 61377404 +- 2468763 9 bad chromium@486797 60988275 +- 3866029 14 bad chromium@486853 61361597 +- 3807884 14 bad chromium@487758 61475187 +- 4102879 14 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.shopping.avito system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8968440492314271264 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Dec 7 2017
This is a small regression and most of these graphs present newer regressions associated to different bugs - maybe mark WontFix?
,
Dec 8 2017
+1 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Jul 24 2017