Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 487677:487754 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jul 24 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8973194456279456256
,
Jul 24 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus6_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:proportional_resident_size_avg/browse_tools/browse_tools_maps Revision Result N chromium@487676 178553447 +- 2817611 21 good chromium@487754 178506538 +- 2530195 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.tools.maps system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8973194456279456256 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Jul 24 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8973184342554492416
,
Jul 24 2017
Clicked off a bisect with a larger range.
,
Jul 24 2017
,
Jul 25 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found but unable to narrow commit range Build failures prevented the bisect from narrowing the range further. Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus6_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:proportional_resident_size_avg/browse_tools/browse_tools_maps Change : 1.14% | 176416749.333 -> 178420717.333 Suspected Commit Range 6 commits in range https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/2a17bfdfaba69be381c18c170553cd165062dde4..7891182716ec2c31a7e216d830c4e6f827a778d5 Revision Result N chromium@486073 176416749 +- 1034351 6 good chromium@486506 176985980 +- 1407009 9 good chromium@486722 177237528 +- 1879516 8 good chromium@486749 177924541 +- 2881827 14 good chromium@486760 178025697 +- 1953345 14 good chromium@486761 --- --- build failure chromium@486762 --- --- build failure chromium@486763 --- --- build failure chromium@486764 --- --- build failure chromium@486765 --- --- build failure chromium@486766 178707535 +- 2222789 14 bad chromium@486769 178558275 +- 2889398 21 bad chromium@486776 178775631 +- 2505603 14 bad chromium@486830 178975896 +- 1737995 6 bad chromium@486938 178499452 +- 2198431 9 bad chromium@487803 178420717 +- 824742 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.tools.maps system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8973184342554492416 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Sep 14 2017
Only found on one device/page, bisect can't repro. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Jul 24 2017