Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.1%-3.3% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 485991:487676 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jul 21 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8973425039479268848
,
Jul 21 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:malloc:effective_size_avg/background_news/background_news_nytimes Revision Result N chromium@486056 52918477 +- 2114116 21 good chromium@486073 52926885 +- 1901860 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=background.news.nytimes system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8973425039479268848 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Jul 24 2017
,
Sep 14 2017
This is pretty old and bisect can't repro. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Jul 21 2017