Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
8.7%-12.4% regression in smoothness.gpu_rasterization.tough_filters_cases at 485972:486144 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionThis might be difficult to justify.
,
Jul 21 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8973437254200094176
,
Jul 21 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Florin Malita Commit : 4d3622e28d891b3a445275d132a6817bb83973ed Date : Wed Jul 12 20:02:25 2017 Subject: Remove flag to stop relying on Skia's bilerp-hack Bisect Details Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect Benchmark : smoothness.gpu_rasterization.tough_filters_cases Metric : frame_times/MotionMark Focus Change : 10.12% | 40.8446562884 -> 44.9793869334 Revision Result N chromium@486025 40.8447 +- 0.791413 6 good chromium@486055 40.6421 +- 1.33242 6 good chromium@486063 40.8231 +- 0.812528 9 good chromium@486067 40.7328 +- 1.10673 6 good chromium@486068 45.2008 +- 0.88748 6 bad <-- chromium@486069 44.7623 +- 1.5384 6 bad chromium@486070 44.7746 +- 4.67553 9 bad chromium@486085 45.3293 +- 1.16914 6 bad chromium@486144 44.9794 +- 1.29546 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=MotionMark.Focus smoothness.gpu_rasterization.tough_filters_cases More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8973437254200094176 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Jul 21 2017