New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 747481 link

Starred by 2 users

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Jul 23
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 3
Type: Feature



Sign in to add a comment

Host layout tests somewhere so that it's easy to link to and debug them.

Project Member Reported by qyears...@chromium.org, Jul 21 2017

Issue description

Background:

Right now in the layout test results.html, there are links to files hosted in Gerrit, e.g.:

https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/e6175fbae15f0377390f8262593a5d3da4305f17/third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/fast/forms/calendar-picker/calendar-picker-appearance-zoom200.html

But for debugging purposes, it would be more helpful to be able to load the actual HTML page rather than just viewing the source.

When viewing the test results for a local run, links could be made to the local copy, but for test results for a run on a bit, links to somewhere else where the test is hosted would be nice.

As long as the tests are hosted somewhere (e.g. google storage or anywhere else) and updated so that the tests in Chromium ToT are available, then links could be made.

Note, for web-platform-tests, tests are hosted at w3c-test.org and served with the wptserve server (the same as what's used when running the tests), so that's good:
http://w3c-test.org/css/css-images-3/css-image-fallbacks-and-annotations002.html
 
Project Member

Comment 1 by sheriffbot@chromium.org, Jul 23

Labels: Hotlist-Recharge-Cold
Status: Untriaged (was: Available)
This issue has been Available for over a year. If it's no longer important or seems unlikely to be fixed, please consider closing it out. If it is important, please re-triage the issue.

Sorry for the inconvenience if the bug really should have been left as Available.

For more details visit https://www.chromium.org/issue-tracking/autotriage - Your friendly Sheriffbot
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
I think this would be neat, but it's very hard for me to see anyone prioritize it, so rather than setting it to available once a year I'll close and count on someone to reopen if the need becomes pressing.
I think it is not as trivial as I initially thought. Initial idea was to just host "tip-of-the-tree" tests somewhere.

The problem is that "tip-of-the-tree" does not work if you want to run tests from a particular CL. Implementing "run tests from particular CL" is more complex. I think this case is common enough that running just "tip-of-the-tree" is not good enough.


Sign in to add a comment