CHECK failure: IsJavascriptAllowed(). Cannot CallJavascriptFunction before explicitly allowing |
|||
Issue descriptionDetailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=6453832518467584 Fuzzer: ipc_fuzzer_gen Job Type: windows_asan_chrome_ipc Platform Id: windows Crash Type: CHECK failure Crash Address: Crash State: IsJavascriptAllowed(). Cannot CallJavascriptFunction before explicitly allowing content::WebUIMessageHandler::CallJavascriptFunction<base::Value,base::Value,bas content::WebUIMessageHandler::FireWebUIListener<base::Value,base::Value,base::Va Sanitizer: address (ASAN) Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=windows_asan_chrome_ipc&range=488146:488166 Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=6453832518467584 Issue filed automatically. See https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz-tools for more information.
,
Jul 21 2017
+tommycli I don't seem to have access to the "detailed report" link. Also looking at the linked CL, it seems unlikely to have introduced the issue (in 1st case AllowJavascript() is already called, in 2nd case the code was already calling CallJavascriptFunction). Is there a longer stack trace available?
,
Jul 25 2017
ClusterFuzz has detected this issue as fixed in range 489161:489186. Detailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=6453832518467584 Fuzzer: ipc_fuzzer_gen Job Type: windows_asan_chrome_ipc Platform Id: windows Crash Type: CHECK failure Crash Address: Crash State: IsJavascriptAllowed(). Cannot CallJavascriptFunction before explicitly allowing content::WebUIMessageHandler::CallJavascriptFunction<base::Value,base::Value,bas content::WebUIMessageHandler::FireWebUIListener<base::Value,base::Value,base::Va Sanitizer: address (ASAN) Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=windows_asan_chrome_ipc&range=488146:488166 Fixed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=windows_asan_chrome_ipc&range=489161:489186 Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=6453832518467584 See https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz-tools for more information. If you suspect that the result above is incorrect, try re-doing that job on the test case report page.
,
Jul 25 2017
ClusterFuzz testcase 6453832518467584 is verified as fixed, so closing issue as verified. If this is incorrect, please add ClusterFuzz-Wrong label and re-open the issue. |
|||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||
Comment 1 by msrchandra@chromium.org
, Jul 21 2017Labels: M-61 Test-Predator-Wrong
Owner: dpa...@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)