Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
5.7%-581.1% regression in v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop at 485715:485896 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jul 19 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8973651538448496096
,
Jul 19 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: linux_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop Metric : v8-gc-incremental-start_sum/browse_social/browse_social_facebook_infinite_scroll Revision Result N chromium@485714 0.824429 +- 0.786829 21 good chromium@485896 0.94519 +- 0.968921 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.social.facebook.infinite.scroll v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8973651538448496096 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Jul 25 2017
We didn't have data for a long time and the alerts started happening on the first spike that is within noise. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Jul 19 2017