Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
5.2% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 486847:486914 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jul 19 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8973652672980209344
,
Jul 19 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:malloc:effective_size_avg/load_news/load_news_cnn Revision Result N chromium@486846 46378872 +- 5938178 21 good chromium@486914 46626557 +- 5102387 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.news.cnn system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8973652672980209344 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Jul 20 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8973570461612955200
,
Jul 20 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found but unable to narrow commit range Build failures prevented the bisect from narrowing the range further. Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:malloc:effective_size_avg/load_news/load_news_cnn Change : 2.57% | 45180509.2143 -> 46341290.1429 Suspected Commit Range 12 commits in range https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/4afd513b88234976f17b06eee24892ce9d149e7e..e5ef88bfc930b8066ae7c8a5ec5cf35577bbcd2b Revision Result N chromium@486438 45180509 +- 3357761 14 good chromium@486724 44550924 +- 3064035 9 good chromium@486742 44732347 +- 3576981 14 good chromium@486745 44347555 +- 1754329 6 good chromium@486745,v8@44cce0fcc0 --- --- build failure --- --- --- too many build failures to list chromium@486745,v8@a97abb909b --- --- build failure chromium@486746 46470495 +- 1715247 6 bad chromium@486747 45962405 +- 3288739 14 bad chromium@486751 45920110 +- 5291314 21 bad chromium@486760 46366155 +- 4749103 14 bad chromium@486796 45834583 +- 2563185 14 bad chromium@486867 46189720 +- 4700015 14 bad chromium@487009 46341290 +- 3835920 14 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.news.cnn system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8973570461612955200 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Jul 21 2017
This happens in the v8 roll below. https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+log/a29b8877..a97abb90 machenbach, I'd tentatively assign you to this since you submitted one CL in the rolled v8 range. Could you reassign people who is better to investigate this?
,
Jul 21 2017
-> performance or memory sheriff If the output above is reliable, we're talking about: https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+log/a29b8877..a97abb90 + nednguyen for failed bisect into V8
,
Jul 21 2017
,
Jul 24 2017
Annie, the blocked-on bug looks like a mistake?
,
Sep 14 2017
doesn't look like there's much we can do about this: the build fails testing the v8 changes. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Jul 19 2017