Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
48% regression in page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif at 484783:484843 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jul 17 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8973806335237535872
,
Jul 17 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: win_8_perf_bisect Benchmark : page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif Metric : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___www.nationalgeographic.com_ Revision Result N chromium@484782 382.039 +- 427.11 21 good chromium@484843 401.811 +- 450.649 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.nationalgeographic.com. page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8973806335237535872 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Sep 14 2017
This test has been decommissioned. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Jul 17 2017