New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 744683 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Sep 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

30.4% regression in page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif at 477411:485714

Project Member Reported by nzolghadr@chromium.org, Jul 17 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
Project Member

Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jul 17 2017

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=744683

(For debugging:) Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?sid=220b3864d80dff10fdadf18d7c344a226c85f603c5d77e05e857620fdc2a374b


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

linux-release
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jul 18 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Bisect failed for unknown reasons

Please contact the team (see below) and report the error.


Bisect Details
  Configuration: linux_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif
  Metric       : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___booking.com


To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...booking.com page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif

More information on addressing performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Debug information about this bisect:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8973806355924950704


For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
This test has been decommissioned.

Sign in to add a comment