Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
17% regression in system_health.common_desktop at 486751:486845 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jul 17 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8973807273293521552
,
Jul 17 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.common_desktop Metric : load:energy_sum/browse_search/browse_search_google Revision Result N chromium@486750 103.485 +- 17.459 21 good chromium@486845 104.603 +- 24.2302 20 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.search.google system_health.common_desktop More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8973807273293521552 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Aug 7 2017
Looking at the graphs, it's clear that the ref builders are also regressing, so this is infra or a change that affects both. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Jul 17 2017