Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
23.9% regression in smoothness.tough_filters_cases at 485715:485896 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jul 13 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8974158287862297088
,
Jul 13 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: linux_perf_bisect Benchmark : smoothness.tough_filters_cases Metric : frame_times/Analog Clock SVG Revision Result N chromium@485714 16.68 +- 0.0460196 21 good chromium@485896 16.6766 +- 0.0436865 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=Analog.Clock.SVG smoothness.tough_filters_cases More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8974158287862297088 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Aug 21 2017
Assigning to senorblanco, owner of smoothness.tough_filters_cases: both ToT and ref build got very noisy on linux, any thoughts on how to address?
,
Aug 21 2017
No idea off the top of my head. Has the bot been rebooted since it started happening?
,
Aug 21 2017
Yep, looks like the bot was down from July 3 to July 12, and after restarting this started.
,
Aug 21 2017
In that case, I've got nothin'. :(
,
Sep 21 2017
We're probably going to move to new linux hardware anyway. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Jul 13 2017