Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
160.2% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 485600:485672 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jul 13 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8974178131289589024
,
Jul 14 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:skia:effective_size_avg/load_games/load_games_bubbles Revision Result N chromium@485599 133507482 +- 15764235 21 good chromium@485672 121204268 +- 180753577 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.games.bubbles system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8974178131289589024 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Aug 21 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8970629363342544880
,
Aug 21 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author altimin@chromium.org === Hi altimin@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Alexander Timin Commit : 214a2f9dd64151cfb5626020d8ba74f2d72012a2 Date : Wed Jul 12 01:19:03 2017 Subject: [scheduler] Refactor renderer scheduler policies. Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus7_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:native_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/browse_social/browse_social_tumblr_infinite_scroll Change : 11.49% | 127388970.286 -> 147438963.429 Revision Result N chromium@485345 127388970 +- 38577430 14 good chromium@485580 120572454 +- 23795222 9 good chromium@485697 124974232 +- 42817238 14 good chromium@485755 122531252 +- 34478284 9 good chromium@485758 128922995 +- 47345248 14 good chromium@485759 132683197 +- 55453428 14 good chromium@485760 151728646 +- 51150919 14 bad <-- chromium@485764 147603437 +- 24923958 9 bad chromium@485771 145606467 +- 24514691 6 bad chromium@485785 147858413 +- 31468809 9 bad chromium@485814 147438963 +- 44309182 14 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.social.tumblr.infinite.scroll system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8970629363342544880 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Aug 29 2017
Seems that https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/573902 fixed this too. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Jul 13 2017