Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
telemetry_perf_unittests flaky on Android with FATAL:layer_tree_impl.cc(169): Check failed: property_trees()->needs_rebuild |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionThis assertion failure is causing flakiness on the android_n5x_swarming_rel trybot, for example: https://luci-milo.appspot.com/buildbot/tryserver.chromium.android/android_n5x_swarming_rel/219538 It was observed in Issue 741956 which was just filed, but needs to be split off and fixed separately from the larger issue of diagnosing general flakiness on that trybot. It's causing retries on the tryservers and delaying CLs. Compositing / paint teams, could you please see whether this is caused by a recent change and if so link it to the associated bug? Thanks.
,
Jul 13 2017
Issue 740884 has been merged into this issue.
,
Jul 13 2017
I will go ahead and revert the patch while I investigate this.
,
Jul 13 2017
Thanks Philip.
,
Jul 13 2017
Revert is in the queue: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/570698
,
Jul 13 2017
The following revision refers to this bug: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/c2cd1a10878f6262cf0d1a4e3bd8ee8ff9ef9b30 commit c2cd1a10878f6262cf0d1a4e3bd8ee8ff9ef9b30 Author: Philip Rogers <pdr@chromium.org> Date: Thu Jul 13 23:29:58 2017 Revert "Remove LayerImpl dependency from LayerTreeImpl::DidUpdateScrollOffset" This reverts commit 5657b4033dc807c8e34a76ce44f3d1e1c3afe174. Reason for revert: Telemetry test flakes, see: crbug.com/742039 Original change's description: > Remove LayerImpl dependency from LayerTreeImpl::DidUpdateScrollOffset > > This patch removes the LayerImpl references from DidUpdateScrollOffset. > Instead of looking up scroll and transform property nodes with Layers, > ElementId is used. > > The invariant now used in LayerTreeImpl::DidUpdateScrollOffset (and > Layer::UpdateScrollOffset) is that a scroll node should exist or the tree > should be marked as needing a rebuild which will update the scroll node; > there should be no other codepaths that update scroll offset. A TODO > has been added to require that a scroll node exists in all cases. > > Tests have been modified to ensure property trees exist before updating > scroll offset. This should be true in all real cases but is not for > synthetic testing scenarios. > > A bug has been fixed in UpdateScrollChildPosition where the scroll layer > was not actually scrollable. > > Bug: > Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel;master.tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_layout_tests_slimming_paint_v2 > Change-Id: I75d881a0c05a6fd81ae028bdaead9481641d201f > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/560584 > Commit-Queue: Philip Rogers <pdr@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: enne <enne@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#485335} TBR=pdr@chromium.org,enne@chromium.org # Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed > 1 day ago. Bug: 742039 Change-Id: Idd87e6af6a88a3b033864310134b8a379316ab9e Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel;master.tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_layout_tests_slimming_paint_v2 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/570698 Reviewed-by: Philip Rogers <pdr@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Philip Rogers <pdr@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#486529} [modify] https://crrev.com/c2cd1a10878f6262cf0d1a4e3bd8ee8ff9ef9b30/cc/test/layer_test_common.h [modify] https://crrev.com/c2cd1a10878f6262cf0d1a4e3bd8ee8ff9ef9b30/cc/trees/layer_tree_host_common_unittest.cc [modify] https://crrev.com/c2cd1a10878f6262cf0d1a4e3bd8ee8ff9ef9b30/cc/trees/layer_tree_host_impl_unittest.cc [modify] https://crrev.com/c2cd1a10878f6262cf0d1a4e3bd8ee8ff9ef9b30/cc/trees/layer_tree_impl.cc
,
Jul 13 2017
Annie, This test caught something useful because this codepath should never be hit (was planning on removing it entirely in a followup). I'm having trouble actually running the test though. What command do I run to run "benchmarks.system_health_smoke_test.SystemHealthBenchmarkSmokeTest.system_health.memory_mobile.browse:news:cricbuzz" on my android device?
,
Jul 13 2017
Philip: You can run: tools/perf/run_tests --browser=android-chromium memory_mobile.browse:news:cricbuzz To setup your device: go/telemetry-device-setup
,
Jul 14 2017
Thanks Ned. I was able to get a Nexus 6 up and running pretty easily. Unfortunately this does not reproduce on the Nexus 6. I am going to order a 5x.
,
Jul 14 2017
Was able to get this to crash! Requires a release build for timing. Still is flaky. Stacktrace: 000a4787 logging::LogMessage::~LogMessage()+ 00125ae7 cc::LayerTreeImpl::DidUpdateScrollOffset(cc::ElementId)+ 00125ba1 cc::LayerTreeImpl::DidUpdateScrollOffset(cc::ElementId)+ 001330d1 cc::ScrollTree::ScrollBy(cc::ScrollNode*, gfx::Vector2dF const&, cc::LayerTreeImpl*)+ 00122ac9 cc::LayerTreeHostImpl::ScrollSingleNode(cc::ScrollNode*, gfx::Vector2dF const&, gfx::Point const&, bool, cc::ScrollTree*)+ 000a0833 cc::Viewport::ScrollBy(gfx::Vector2dF const&, gfx::Point const&, bool, bool, bool)+ 0011c3fd cc::LayerTreeHostImpl::AnimateBrowserControls(base::TimeTicks)+ 0011c1b3 cc::LayerTreeHostImpl::AnimateInternal(bool)+ 00120153 cc::LayerTreeHostImpl::WillBeginImplFrame(cc::BeginFrameArgs const&)+ 000f181f cc::Scheduler::BeginImplFrame(cc::BeginFrameArgs const&, base::TimeTicks)+ 000f1363 cc::Scheduler::BeginImplFrameWithDeadline(cc::BeginFrameArgs const&)+
,
Jul 17 2017
The following revision refers to this bug: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/80d5a3ec9a3f7a2a94bfaa36aacc62979322125a commit 80d5a3ec9a3f7a2a94bfaa36aacc62979322125a Author: pdr <pdr@chromium.org> Date: Mon Jul 17 19:04:07 2017 Remove LayerImpl dependency from LayerTreeImpl::DidUpdateScrollOffset This patch removes the LayerImpl references from DidUpdateScrollOffset. Instead of looking up scroll and transform property nodes with Layers, ElementId is used. Tests have been modified to ensure property trees exist before updating scroll offset. This should be true in all real cases but is not for synthetic testing scenarios. A bug has been fixed in UpdateScrollChildPosition where the scroll layer was not actually scrollable. This is a reland of [1] which was rolled out because the active tree can have a scroll offset for an element id that is not present in the pending tree. The comment in DidUpdateScrollOffset has been updated to reflect this. This is tested in PushPropertiesToMirrorsCurrentScrollOffset. [1] https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/560584/ Bug: 743241 , 742039 Change-Id: Ia13380d749843064f30de76ccfeeb5e72502e6b2 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/572426 Reviewed-by: enne <enne@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Philip Rogers <pdr@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#487183} [modify] https://crrev.com/80d5a3ec9a3f7a2a94bfaa36aacc62979322125a/cc/test/layer_test_common.h [modify] https://crrev.com/80d5a3ec9a3f7a2a94bfaa36aacc62979322125a/cc/trees/layer_tree_host_common_unittest.cc [modify] https://crrev.com/80d5a3ec9a3f7a2a94bfaa36aacc62979322125a/cc/trees/layer_tree_host_impl_unittest.cc [modify] https://crrev.com/80d5a3ec9a3f7a2a94bfaa36aacc62979322125a/cc/trees/layer_tree_impl.cc
,
Jul 17 2017
,
Jul 21 2017
The following revision refers to this bug: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/4131a1c1ef8bdde8e752353ad6e24771d3b866da commit 4131a1c1ef8bdde8e752353ad6e24771d3b866da Author: Philip Rogers <pdr@chromium.org> Date: Fri Jul 21 19:36:50 2017 Revert "Remove LayerImpl dependency from LayerTreeImpl::DidUpdateScrollOffset" This reverts commit 80d5a3ec9a3f7a2a94bfaa36aacc62979322125a. Reason for revert: May be the cause of scroll offset crashes ( crbug.com/746718 ) Original change's description: > Remove LayerImpl dependency from LayerTreeImpl::DidUpdateScrollOffset > > This patch removes the LayerImpl references from DidUpdateScrollOffset. > Instead of looking up scroll and transform property nodes with Layers, > ElementId is used. > > Tests have been modified to ensure property trees exist before updating > scroll offset. This should be true in all real cases but is not for > synthetic testing scenarios. > > A bug has been fixed in UpdateScrollChildPosition where the scroll layer > was not actually scrollable. > > This is a reland of [1] which was rolled out because the active tree can > have a scroll offset for an element id that is not present in the pending > tree. The comment in DidUpdateScrollOffset has been updated to reflect > this. This is tested in PushPropertiesToMirrorsCurrentScrollOffset. > [1] https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/560584/ > > Bug: 743241 , 742039 > Change-Id: Ia13380d749843064f30de76ccfeeb5e72502e6b2 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/572426 > Reviewed-by: enne <enne@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Philip Rogers <pdr@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#487183} TBR=pdr@chromium.org,enne@chromium.org # Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed > 1 day ago. Bug: 743241 , 746718 Change-Id: I3a02c7a22c6db2d2e3eafcb83eace9e37db8c1d6 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/581629 Reviewed-by: Philip Rogers <pdr@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Philip Rogers <pdr@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#488737} [modify] https://crrev.com/4131a1c1ef8bdde8e752353ad6e24771d3b866da/cc/test/layer_test_common.h [modify] https://crrev.com/4131a1c1ef8bdde8e752353ad6e24771d3b866da/cc/trees/layer_tree_host_common_unittest.cc [modify] https://crrev.com/4131a1c1ef8bdde8e752353ad6e24771d3b866da/cc/trees/layer_tree_host_impl_unittest.cc [modify] https://crrev.com/4131a1c1ef8bdde8e752353ad6e24771d3b866da/cc/trees/layer_tree_impl.cc |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by ajuma@chromium.org
, Jul 13 2017Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)