Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
3.5%-24.9% regression in memory.top_10_mobile at 484175:484247 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jul 6 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8974808837779440576
,
Jul 6 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8974808792613479920
,
Jul 8 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : perezju Commit : b5c1738572410f30cbcae23354f1738cf0b222ef Date : Wed Jul 05 08:52:52 2017 Subject: [Telemetry] Trigger GC on Chrome processes forked from Zygote Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_nexus6_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile Metric : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:java_heap:effective_size_avg/foreground/http_yandex_ru_touchsearch_text_science Change : 24.96% | 27313560.5 -> 34130226.3333 Revision Result N chromium@484174 27313561 +- 3214.76 6 good chromium@484211 27313095 +- 975.485 6 good chromium@484229 27312963 +- 2062.43 6 good chromium@484238 27313216 +- 1560.45 6 good chromium@484239 27313244 +- 1868.4 6 good chromium@484239,catapult@b5c1738572 34128932 +- 39581.1 6 bad <-- chromium@484240 34128408 +- 38024.8 6 bad chromium@484241 34127644 +- 34313.5 6 bad chromium@484243 34130462 +- 28544.6 6 bad chromium@484247 34130226 +- 30213.0 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8974808837779440576 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Jul 8 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect was unable to run to completion Error: TIMEOUT The bisect was able to narrow the range, you can try running with: good_revision: 28232bff5f48813f417f3d808a68a0858f1765ad bad_revision : 88192782118553e9341132cece3a241c241a3b90 If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_nexus6_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile Metric : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:java_heap:effective_size_avg/foreground/http_www_amazon_com_gp_aw_s_k_nexus Change : 24.11% | 27516835.3333 -> 34150821.6667 Revision Result N chromium@484174 27516835 +- 2208.27 6 good chromium@484211 27517237 +- 1378.17 6 good chromium@484229 27516818 +- 1110.58 6 good chromium@484238 27516707 +- 1738.86 6 good chromium@484241 34158106 +- 9773.55 6 bad chromium@484243 34154706 +- 30974.9 6 bad chromium@484247 34150822 +- 22793.0 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8974808792613479920 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Jul 6 2017