Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
9.5% regression in memory.top_10_mobile at 483903:483906 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jul 5 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8974915909854030496
,
Jul 6 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_nexus6_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile Metric : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/background/after_https_mobile_twitter_com_justinbieber_skip_interstitial_true Revision Result N chromium@483902 3653308 +- 1122654 21 good chromium@483906 3673946 +- 1092633 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8974915909854030496 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Aug 18 2017
This went back to normal levels. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by rmcilroy@chromium.org
, Jul 5 2017