Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
6.1%-37.7% regression in smoothness.gpu_rasterization.tough_filters_cases at 482979:483188 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jul 5 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8974917207715337696
,
Jul 7 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect was unable to run to completion Error: INFRA_FAILURE The bisect was able to narrow the range, you can try running with: good_revision: d2a741e22ed01d0cf2868f4ddddeb984a417849d bad_revision : d2a722f6bd23eaf0f791b19378c639dce6b3c2c0 If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.layout Metric : floats_100_100_nested/floats_100_100_nested Revision Result N chromium@483123 555.852 +- 54.7065 14 good chromium@483139 1190.3 +- 11.9605 6 bad chromium@483154 1194.27 +- 26.3707 6 bad chromium@483188 582.149 +- 83.0235 14 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.layout More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8974917207715337696 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Aug 18 2017
These all eventually recovered. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by rmcilroy@chromium.org
, Jul 5 2017