Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.4%-10.7% regression in memory.top_10_mobile at 483435:483596 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jul 5 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8974917872778184496
,
Jul 5 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found but unable to narrow commit range Build failures prevented the bisect from narrowing the range further. Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:native_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/background_news/background_news_nytimes Change : 7.46% | 64305938.2857 -> 69100081.2308 Suspected Commit Range 3 commits in range https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/ee4d4d912c63490b2fd87eded9f10006a46e49e2..579d7f54029f25dd67141765262594c3a37564cb Revision Result N chromium@483434 64305938 +- 17871477 14 good chromium@483513 62977664 +- 18445471 14 good chromium@483516 63030833 +- 17894228 13 good chromium@483517 63039177 +- 19269076 14 good chromium@483518 --- --- build failure chromium@483519 --- --- build failure chromium@483520 69182738 +- 6286125 14 bad chromium@483525 68752293 +- 5455594 14 bad chromium@483537 69728782 +- 4864363 9 bad chromium@483560 69100081 +- 5331134 13 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=background.news.nytimes system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8974917872778184496 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Aug 18 2017
pdr: sorry for the late notice here, but I'm cleaning up old perfbot bugs and found this one where the bisect failed because the build was broken from r483518 to r483520, but it looks pretty clear that r483520 is the culprit here: it reverts r482782, and the metrics drop at the land and jump at the revert. So looks like that CL was a memory-performance tradeoff. I'm WontFix-ing, but feel free to reopen or work on this in a new bug if you want to investigate further. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by rmcilroy@chromium.org
, Jul 5 2017