New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like █ or █) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 738873 link

Starred by 1 user
Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
█ perezju@google.com
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

1.7% regression in system_health.memory_desktop at 482217:482279

Project Member Reported by perezju@google.com, Jul 3 2017 
See the link to graphs below.
Project Member

Comment 2 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jul 3 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_pro_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_desktop
  Metric       : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_avg/load_media/load_media_imgur

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@482216      47997970 +- 1894571      21      good
chromium@482279      47918866 +- 1250590      21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.media.imgur system_health.memory_desktop

More information on addressing performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Debug information about this bisect:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8975087025522794656


For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection

Comment 5 by perezju@chromium.org, Jul 3 2017

Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
land/revert, small regression
Project Member

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jul 3 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_pro_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_desktop
  Metric       : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_avg/load_media/load_media_imgur

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@482216      47992652 +- 1593038      21      good
chromium@482279      48192822 +- 1717578      21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.media.imgur system_health.memory_desktop

More information on addressing performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Debug information about this bisect:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8975082740082412480


For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
►

Sign in to add a comment