Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.1%-1.7% regression in memory.top_10_mobile at 482283:482424 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jun 29 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect was unable to run to completion Error: INFRA_FAILURE The bisect was able to narrow the range, you can try running with: good_revision: 3aeae9f58d9507abd2ecef33041fc2685eb79613 bad_revision : 3091104c4600073df5584780a4a0798205b26d69 If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: android_one_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/background/after_http_www_amazon_com_gp_aw_s_k_nexus Revision Result N chromium@482283 2971794 +- 133542 14 good chromium@482319 2978457 +- 165281 14 good chromium@482337 2966739 +- 279817 14 good chromium@482346 2977234 +- 104321 14 good chromium@482349 --- --- build failure chromium@482350 --- --- build failure chromium@482351 --- --- build failure chromium@482352 --- --- build failure chromium@482354 3008592 +- 122391 14 bad chromium@482424 3023119 +- 115698 14 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8975548555066411872 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5795112631664640 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jun 29 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8975452682064615344
,
Jun 29 2017
Alerts for this bug: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=737525
,
Jun 29 2017
All small (< 50KiB) regressions, appear to be a pair of a land/revert pattern, and the build was broken while the regression got introduced. So, not worth to investigate further.
,
Jun 29 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_one_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/background/after_http_www_amazon_com_gp_aw_s_k_nexus Revision Result N chromium@482283 2983146 +- 173122 21 good chromium@482424 3002546 +- 104544 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8975452682064615344 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Jun 28 2017