New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 737511 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner:
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

277.7% regression in v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop at 482056:482149

Project Member Reported by ulan@google.com, Jun 28 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

Comment 2 by u...@chromium.org, Jun 28 2017

Status: Untriaged (was: Assigned)
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 28 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: linux_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop
  Metric       : v8-gc-total_max/browse_social/browse_social_tumblr_infinite_scroll

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@482055      6.27733 +- 3.42463      21      good
chromium@482149      6.15914 +- 2.69673      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.social.tumblr.infinite.scroll v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8975552007028348912

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4968816355835904


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 28 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: linux_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop
  Metric       : v8-gc-total_max/browse_social/browse_social_tumblr_infinite_scroll

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@482055      6.46495 +- 2.95214      21      good
chromium@482149      6.40024 +- 2.53053      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.social.tumblr.infinite.scroll v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8975535790032947984

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4968816355835904


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 28 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: linux_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop
  Metric       : v8-gc-total_max/browse_social/browse_social_tumblr_infinite_scroll

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@480777      6.25438 +- 3.76978      21      good
chromium@482149      6.06786 +- 2.00729      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.social.tumblr.infinite.scroll v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8975541810085816912

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6103752068562944


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 28 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: linux_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop
  Metric       : v8-gc-total_max/browse_social/browse_social_tumblr_infinite_scroll

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@480777      5.9661 +- 2.14256       21      good
chromium@482149      5.91429 +- 2.17334      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.social.tumblr.infinite.scroll v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8975520691635575776

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6103752068562944


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 10 by sheriffbot@chromium.org, Jul 11 2017

Labels: Hotlist-Google

Comment 11 by u...@chromium.org, Jul 24 2017

Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
Bisect cannot reproduce the regression.

Sign in to add a comment