New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 737507 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner:
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

11.9%-229.9% regression in v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop at 481281:481516

Project Member Reported by ulan@google.com, Jun 28 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

Comment 2 by u...@chromium.org, Jun 28 2017

Status: Untriaged (was: Assigned)
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 28 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: linux_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop
  Metric       : v8-gc-latency-mark-compactor_max/browse_media/browse_media_tumblr

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@481280      2.25695 +- 2.32266      21      good
chromium@481516      2.25986 +- 1.69221      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.tumblr v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8975552333990834432

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5664747355111424


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 28 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: linux_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop
  Metric       : v8-gc-latency-mark-compactor_max/browse_media/browse_media_tumblr

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@481280      2.34452 +- 2.02328      21      good
chromium@481516      2.34776 +- 2.16516      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.tumblr v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8975528241843876672

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5664747355111424


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 29 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found, tests failed to produce values

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_10_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop
  Metric       : v8-gc-scavenger_sum/browse_social/browse_social_twitter

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@481504      49.5919 +- 28.2886      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.social.twitter v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop

More information on addressing performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Debug information about this bisect:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8975443431299987008


For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
Project Member

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 29 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found, tests failed to produce values

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_10_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop
  Metric       : v8-gc-scavenger_sum/browse_social/browse_social_twitter

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@481504      50.1842 +- 34.2746      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.social.twitter v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop

More information on addressing performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Debug information about this bisect:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8975426250007060144


For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
Project Member

Comment 10 by sheriffbot@chromium.org, Jul 11 2017

Labels: Hotlist-Google

Comment 11 by u...@chromium.org, Jul 24 2017

Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
Bisect bot cannot reproduce the regression.

Sign in to add a comment