New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 737500 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner:
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

28.2%-338.4% regression in v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop at 480778:481280

Project Member Reported by ulan@google.com, Jun 28 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

Comment 2 by u...@chromium.org, Jun 28 2017

Status: Untriaged (was: Assigned)
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 28 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: linux_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop
  Metric       : v8-gc-phantom-handle-callback_max/browse_media/browse_media_tumblr

Revision             Result                     N
chromium@480777      0.051 +- 0.0297658         21      good
chromium@481280      0.0627143 +- 0.103278      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.tumblr v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8975553019310119648

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6056135645200384


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 29 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: linux_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop
  Metric       : v8-gc-phantom-handle-callback_max/browse_media/browse_media_tumblr

Revision             Result                      N
chromium@480777      0.0719524 +- 0.0556862      21      good
chromium@481280      0.0761905 +- 0.0537702      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.tumblr v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8975524463573883040

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6056135645200384


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 30 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Bisect was unable to run to completion

Error: INFRA_FAILURE

The bisect was able to narrow the range, you can try running with:
  good_revision: a76034b7173c0ac0ef978b694a8d41f4fd663780
  bad_revision : af20afb7dfb538bb139dfba37219c6a8e9a94124

If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error.


Bisect Details
  Configuration: linux_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop
  Metric       : v8-gc-total_sum/browse_media/browse_media_tumblr

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@480777      162.659 +- 29.5633      14       good
chromium@480793      162.902 +- 49.1987      14       good
chromium@480799      159.539 +- 26.4833      14       good
chromium@480800      ---                     ---      build failure
---                  ---                     ---      too many build failures to list
chromium@480811      ---                     ---      build failure
chromium@480812      148.979 +- 50.8388      21       bad
chromium@480843      152.108 +- 33.0353      14       bad
chromium@480909      150.455 +- 25.1134      14       bad
chromium@481040      149.643 +- 38.1178      14       bad
chromium@481280      146.35 +- 18.1271       9        bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.tumblr v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop

More information on addressing performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Debug information about this bisect:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8975450980013918896


For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Bisect was unable to run to completion

Please try rerunning the bisect.


If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error.


Bisect Details
  Configuration: linux_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop
  Metric       : v8-gc-total_sum/browse_media/browse_media_tumblr

Revision                           Result                  N
chromium@480777                    159.443 +- 58.1608      21       good
chromium@480793                    164.384 +- 45.2267      14       good
chromium@480794                    160.957 +- 53.5848      21       good
chromium@480794,v8@1539f12568      159.002 +- 46.9098      21       good
chromium@480794,v8@6f0ca10e3f      ---                     ---      build failure
chromium@480795                    150.001 +- 29.2912      14       bad
chromium@480797                    151.552 +- 41.8106      14       bad
chromium@480802                    152.164 +- 43.5004      21       bad
chromium@480811                    148.312 +- 48.7067      21       bad
chromium@480843                    143.537 +- 27.4119      14       bad
chromium@480909                    146.681 +- 26.3745      14       bad
chromium@481040                    141.841 +- 11.6959      9        bad
chromium@481280                    146.861 +- 21.984       14       bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.tumblr v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop

More information on addressing performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Debug information about this bisect:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8975358309994785152


For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
Project Member

Comment 10 by sheriffbot@chromium.org, Jul 11 2017

Labels: Hotlist-Google

Comment 11 by u...@chromium.org, Jul 24 2017

Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
Bisect bot cannot reproduce the regression.

Sign in to add a comment