New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 737483 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Fixed
Owner:
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

1.5% regression in system_health.memory_desktop at 481826:481867

Project Member Reported by ulan@google.com, Jun 28 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
Project Member

Comment 2 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 28 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_pro_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_desktop
  Metric       : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_avg/load_media/load_media_imgur

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@481825      47673458 +- 1823138      21      good
chromium@481867      47529857 +- 1761300      21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.media.imgur system_health.memory_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8975554526271844768

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4575302728024064


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 3 by u...@chromium.org, Jun 28 2017

Status: Untriaged (was: Assigned)
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 28 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_pro_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_desktop
  Metric       : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_avg/load_media/load_media_imgur

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@481825      47617758 +- 1553129      21      good
chromium@481867      47484475 +- 1679358      21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.media.imgur system_health.memory_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8975550891150019184

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4575302728024064


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 6 by sheriffbot@chromium.org, Jul 12 2017

Labels: Hotlist-Google

Comment 7 by u...@chromium.org, Jul 24 2017

Status: Fixed (was: Untriaged)
https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=737483

Graphs recovered.

Sign in to add a comment